NiceKicks.com   


 

Air Jordan Fusion 3 White/Cement

Air Jordan Fusion 3 White/CementTomorrow, two of the most anticipated Fusions will release. For many the Fusions still are a love/hate shoe, but original colorways of White/Cement and Black/Cement on the Jordan Fusion 3 are too familiar to some of the greatest Air Jordans to pass.

The Jordan Fusion 3 retails for $135 which comes well under the $310 price tag of the Jordan 20/3 Countdown Package in a few months. Take another look at the White/Cement Fusion 3’s after the jump. Photos thanks to Millennium Shoes.

Air Jordan Fusion 3 White/Cement
Air Jordan Fusion 3 White/Cement

Air Jordan Fusion 3 White/Cement
Air Jordan Fusion 3 White/Cement

Air Jordan Fusion 3 White/Cement
Air Jordan Fusion 3 White/Cement

Air Jordan Fusion 3 White/Cement
Air Jordan Fusion 3 White/Cement

Air Jordan Fusion 3 White/Cement
Air Jordan Fusion 3 White/Cement

Category: Air Jordans September 5, 2008

Related Articles

Air Jordan Fusion 3 Release
Air Jordan 3 Black / Cement Past, Present, and Future (hopefully)
Air Jordan Fusion 3 White/Fire Red-Cement-Black
Air Jordan Fusion 3 Preview
Air Jordan Fusion 3 Black/Fire Red-Cement

50 Comments »

  1. so clean. only fusion that looks good.

    Comment by one3 — September 5, 2008 @ 5:14 pm

  2. Gotta Get The Black And Cement Js//Like This Color 2.These Is This Only The Fusions That I Will Get

    Comment by donquan — September 5, 2008 @ 5:22 pm

  3. got em’ last week
    GIT ON MY LEVEL!

    Comment by KW — September 5, 2008 @ 5:23 pm

  4. My pair came in yesterday(white/cement)…I must admit I’m still on the fence on whether or not these fusions will stand the test of time….

    Comment by soloflight22 — September 5, 2008 @ 5:25 pm

  5. Only Fusion 3s I thought about buying were the black/light blue ones. But I might open my wallet up for these

    Comment by Toasty — September 5, 2008 @ 5:38 pm

  6. Man……these jointz are straight up wack!! I bought them today and took them jointz right back because they pissed me off 5 minutes later just looking at them!!

    Comment by JKINGOFMOCITY — September 5, 2008 @ 5:39 pm

  7. DEY LOOK FAKE

    Comment by RECESSION — September 5, 2008 @ 5:42 pm

  8. these are the only AJ III/ AF1 fusions that look tight i.m.o. the other colorways [aside from the black/cement] look like some terrible factory variants [aka FAKEZ] these are tuff tho

    Comment by Sanerio14 — September 5, 2008 @ 5:43 pm

  9. might cop…still on the fence about em tho

    Comment by Sanerio14 — September 5, 2008 @ 5:43 pm

  10. great colorway but ugly shoe

    Comment by greenmaker24 — September 5, 2008 @ 5:44 pm

  11. straight wack

    Comment by a.k — September 5, 2008 @ 5:51 pm

  12. I want the black ones, those look soooo nice. Might cop the white ones as well.

    I am not too much of a snob to hate on them just because they are fusions. My bred 5 ajf’s are fresh, I love them.

    And imo the fusions are of a better quality than the retro Jordans being released recently anyways…

    Comment by C$ — September 5, 2008 @ 5:57 pm

  13. blahhh!!!!

    Comment by brooklyn — September 5, 2008 @ 6:06 pm

  14. lmao at #5. ..

    Comment by sk — September 5, 2008 @ 6:06 pm

  15. much rather have retro 3

    Comment by ANDY — September 5, 2008 @ 6:13 pm

  16. THEY SHOULD OF PUT NIKE AIR ON THE BACK SINCE THEY’RE SPOSE TO BE FORCES TOO.

    Comment by sneakerog — September 5, 2008 @ 6:22 pm

  17. ^ Yeah that wouldve been tight but ill still cop these and the black ones too.

    Comment by RZ 21 — September 5, 2008 @ 6:37 pm

  18. true that^^^…
    like the way the bubble looks in this pair.
    good colorway but much rather spend a lil money and find the real thing..
    this one shoudlve been in teh CDPs rather tahn the black ones Imo

    Comment by fliprg91 — September 5, 2008 @ 6:39 pm

  19. comment 5
    you made me laugh so hard my throat is sore lol but yea these suck like all fusion

    Comment by iceberg313 — September 5, 2008 @ 6:49 pm

  20. luk decent wuldnt copp dou

    Comment by DA One — September 5, 2008 @ 6:57 pm

  21. again not feeling the fusion…. another color way that I will pass on boo, boo, boo.

    Comment by smitty23 — September 5, 2008 @ 7:48 pm

  22. cant lie these are str8 but im coppin the black just becuz JB mess up the 20/3 CDP by makin sum black 20’s sumthingsu just dont do and makin black cat 20’s r one…and dont kno why ppl are hatin on these if u ask me these are kind of and i mean by a lil but kind of better…n e wayz coppin these the 15/8, and of course the 11/12 CDP….H-town TX home of the Screwed and Chopped R.I.P. DJ Screw….

    Comment by Slim — September 5, 2008 @ 8:34 pm

  23. these are pretty gud, but i dont think ima cop these

    Comment by JC — September 5, 2008 @ 8:52 pm

  24. i copped these and the black ones today my first pair of fusions.i would prefer the retros but fu** it.its better than the cdp this month i like the 1s but i dont care i got them.

    Comment by rauls054 — September 5, 2008 @ 9:03 pm

  25. Dem cold

    Comment by m@rcel — September 5, 2008 @ 10:01 pm

  26. these are tight

    Comment by tru jordanhead — September 5, 2008 @ 10:07 pm

  27. I am getting them. Next year Nike is releasing the ” updated version of the 3″ with today’s technology.

    Comment by leigha bang bang — September 5, 2008 @ 10:09 pm

  28. i have to admit…for to be fusions these look real straight…but too bad i got other things to cop HAHAHAHAHHA!!!

    Comment by orthotic — September 5, 2008 @ 10:35 pm

  29. Yooo help me out!! I hrd jordan aint gonna release any more retros is it tru?!!??! Write bak 2 my emial bornnraized@tmail.com

    Comment by help me ! — September 5, 2008 @ 10:38 pm

  30. yo i realise they never add a swoosh sign on the side for every fusion, it would atleast look less wack

    Comment by jaypee — September 5, 2008 @ 11:45 pm

  31. PASS PASS PASS… FUSIONS TO ME ARE JUST AS WHACKED AS THE IMITATIONS. SO, THAT’S WHAT I THINK OF THESE AND THE OTHER FUSIONS THAT HAVE COME OUT, JORDAN IMITATIONS…!

    Comment by oldjumpman — September 6, 2008 @ 12:28 am

  32. WASTE OF MONEY, THEY’RE CRAP…

    Comment by oldjumpman — September 6, 2008 @ 12:31 am

  33. these fusions are nice…..but don’t sleep on the olympic colorways of the retro 1 and the 6RINGS…..
    RIGHT NOW,MJ has a collection day EVERY month…..
    i’m rockin tha blk with a algierz BUN B t-shirt 4 tha club tomorrow nite!CHECK MY SWAG!!!!!

    Comment by young G. S. — September 6, 2008 @ 4:02 am

  34. @ #3

    Exactly what level is the WACK level? Just curious…

    Comment by nikeindabutt — September 6, 2008 @ 7:31 am

  35. ^^^^yea i know stupid little kids these days having asthma attacks for some fusions that looks like some fake OG 3s. i have the 20/3 pack get on my level

    Comment by xnyles — September 6, 2008 @ 10:07 am

  36. the only fusion i would go out and buy

    Comment by big d (double meaning, ya digg??) — September 6, 2008 @ 10:37 am

  37. easy pass

    Comment by JoseBronX — September 6, 2008 @ 11:01 am

  38. yo i realise they never add a swoosh sign on the side for every fusion, it would atleast look less wack

    Comment by jaypee — September 5, 2008 @ 11:45 pm

    yo they should add a nike swoosh on the sides since they are 50% uptowns and that would add more to the shoe that’s already plain

    Comment by JerseyCityStandUp — September 6, 2008 @ 11:34 am

  39. ^^^fellas if they add a swoosh, then people would b complaining JB “overdoing it” with the swoosh. Plus it was always a JB staple not to have a swoosh. I reember when the “2″s came out when I was a youngbul everybody was trippin b/c there was no swoosh. BTW- these are the best fusions thus far. IMO I wouldn’t have came out with the black ones- they’re undervaluing the 20/3 pack.

    Comment by Coach K — September 6, 2008 @ 11:56 am

  40. I don’t even think the fact that these and the blacks, are colorways of two of most sought after Jordan III’s, will even save this Fusion.

    Comment by Darneezy — September 6, 2008 @ 3:29 pm

  41. These look clean, but is it me or does the sole look dirty.

    Comment by Alex — September 6, 2008 @ 5:06 pm

  42. NO ALEX, THE SOLE LOOKS THAT WAY, I SAW THESE FUSION 3′S TODAY IN PERSON… AND THE BLACK 3′S TOO, THE SOLE ARE NOT DIRTY…!

    Comment by oldjumpman — September 6, 2008 @ 6:18 pm

  43. those of you that doesnt want these 100% and just thinking of buying them dont do it resist the pressure like i did 20 times over the iv/xix(xixs and the iv’s horrible quality helped)
    thanks to some garbage jbs been releasing ive been saving up money instead of buying mediocre jays so i got myself a deadstock 01 bred 1s for 440

    Comment by ripjordan — September 6, 2008 @ 6:32 pm

  44. fusions should go for $100 at the max…$135 isn’t that bad but these are only air force 1’s with a jumpman on the tongue and no nike check….

    Comment by JerseyCityStandUp — September 6, 2008 @ 11:00 pm

  45. Well i have wanted these since the first pics were posted a few months ago but yesteday when i had them in my hands i was very disapointed. I bought some jordan sandles instead and i am way more happy with my purchase because those shoes look so fake!

    Comment by la4sho23 — September 7, 2008 @ 11:19 am

  46. oh well if they made the soles look whiter than they would look better in my opinion…

    Comment by Alex — September 7, 2008 @ 12:32 pm

  47. i wasted a trip to the mall lookin for these..they look hideous in person, as documented in these pics compared to the shots on this site before. very dissapointed in jordan. starting with the 12 fusions (which i passed on too) theyve been looking sloppier and sloppier with each release.

    to top it all off, in canada these run $185. yeah right.

    Comment by Chad — September 7, 2008 @ 2:17 pm

  48. all fusions are dope SICKOOO’s

    Comment by abelino — September 8, 2008 @ 10:33 am

  49. #16 the rumor is that the original sample did have nike air on the back cause it is an af1, but my boy’s nike rep told me gentry made them change it since the back resembled the original 3 so much…wack huh

    Comment by gold — September 8, 2008 @ 1:54 pm

  50. not a fan of any fusions. they look straight but overall, AF1 and jordans don’t go together. 6.5

    Comment by WIZEGUY — September 8, 2008 @ 3:07 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Please refrain from profanity - you know which words are on the bad list.