Comments on: Pete Wentz x Supra Vaider http://www.nicekicks.com/2009/11/pete-wentz-x-supra-vaider/ The source for sneaker news, information, culture, and history. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:20:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: F.O.Bhttp://www.nicekicks.com/2009/11/pete-wentz-x-supra-vaider/comment-page-1/#comment-886218 F.O.B Sat, 17 Jul 2010 15:10:18 +0000 http://nicekicks.com/?p=56531#comment-886218 there awsome there awsome

]]> By: Someguyhttp://www.nicekicks.com/2009/11/pete-wentz-x-supra-vaider/comment-page-1/#comment-713819 Someguy Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:16:31 +0000 http://nicekicks.com/?p=56531#comment-713819 he's a bass player, not a guitarist. he’s a bass player, not a guitarist.

]]> By: greenmaker24http://www.nicekicks.com/2009/11/pete-wentz-x-supra-vaider/comment-page-1/#comment-712509 greenmaker24 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:33:03 +0000 http://nicekicks.com/?p=56531#comment-712509 these are ok these are ok

]]> By: keekersneakerhttp://www.nicekicks.com/2009/11/pete-wentz-x-supra-vaider/comment-page-1/#comment-712056 keekersneaker Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:14:25 +0000 http://nicekicks.com/?p=56531#comment-712056 finally! petey gets his own supra! let me get 2 pairs finally! petey gets his own supra! let me get 2 pairs

]]> By: Jamesonhttp://www.nicekicks.com/2009/11/pete-wentz-x-supra-vaider/comment-page-1/#comment-711999 Jameson Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:48:50 +0000 http://nicekicks.com/?p=56531#comment-711999 I blame pete wentz I blame pete wentz

]]> By: igotkixxhttp://www.nicekicks.com/2009/11/pete-wentz-x-supra-vaider/comment-page-1/#comment-711711 igotkixx Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:45:07 +0000 http://nicekicks.com/?p=56531#comment-711711 i'll go hunting on these. i’ll go hunting on these.

]]> By: retroed airhttp://www.nicekicks.com/2009/11/pete-wentz-x-supra-vaider/comment-page-1/#comment-711563 retroed air Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:26:52 +0000 http://nicekicks.com/?p=56531#comment-711563 i think supras are loosing their hype. i think supras are loosing their hype.

]]> By: sneakerfittedguyhttp://www.nicekicks.com/2009/11/pete-wentz-x-supra-vaider/comment-page-1/#comment-711558 sneakerfittedguy Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:09:28 +0000 http://nicekicks.com/?p=56531#comment-711558 This acid-wash / tye-dye business is getting old. It was nice on the Wildlife release (this looks like it would be part of that NS series ... but NS Vaiders don't make sense, lol) and the older tye-dye NS serires, but it got out of hand as soon as the Purple Tye-dyes came into play. The next shoe they should make with this print should probably be TK's to complete the set, but definitely kill it after that. They should bring back tiger/zebra ACCENTS (Ex. blue tigers - NOT striped magentas, because those joints are uuuugly) onto their shoes, I was really feeling that concept. They could've made it like a trademark kind of thing (like Jordans did with elephant print on 3s and cement speckles on 4s). Signature / exclusive shoe designs are a thumbs-up. Stealing Jordan's ideas (ex. designs and c/w's - Grape and Aqua on Cruizers, which are basically Jordan 4s without the wings? I mean, at least apply it to the signature shoes like the Skytops) are a thumbs-down. I'm not saying that the product didn't turn out nice or that the c/w is only for a certain brand (because I love both Cruizers and 5s), but it's just that the clear imitation is a bit too flattering towards their footwear competitors. It's not a TRUE copyright, but it's a copyright in the minds of all sneaker fans out there. Stick to your own steez, Supra ! This acid-wash / tye-dye business is getting old. It was nice on the Wildlife release (this looks like it would be part of that NS series … but NS Vaiders don’t make sense, lol) and the older tye-dye NS serires, but it got out of hand as soon as the Purple Tye-dyes came into play.

The next shoe they should make with this print should probably be TK’s to complete the set, but definitely kill it after that. They should bring back tiger/zebra ACCENTS (Ex. blue tigers – NOT striped magentas, because those joints are uuuugly) onto their shoes, I was really feeling that concept. They could’ve made it like a trademark kind of thing (like Jordans did with elephant print on 3s and cement speckles on 4s).

Signature / exclusive shoe designs are a thumbs-up. Stealing Jordan’s ideas (ex. designs and c/w’s – Grape and Aqua on Cruizers, which are basically Jordan 4s without the wings? I mean, at least apply it to the signature shoes like the Skytops) are a thumbs-down.

I’m not saying that the product didn’t turn out nice or that the c/w is only for a certain brand (because I love both Cruizers and 5s), but it’s just that the clear imitation is a bit too flattering towards their footwear competitors.

It’s not a TRUE copyright, but it’s a copyright in the minds of all sneaker fans out there. Stick to your own steez, Supra !

]]>