Clae for Spring 2010

857 days ago - by Alex Kroviak - 14 comments

Fresh on the heels of the Clae Fall ’09 Look Book comes this sneak peek at the Spring 2010 lineup. From the Russells to the Parkers, Clae is hooking us up with a sneak peek at 6 models and colorways for the Spring months some of us are already waiting for.

First we see a brown Khan high, which mixes a high-cut with a loafer toe, and a Russell which uses a similar brown, with touches of tan canvas. The Parker low is coming out in an all white make-up, with perforated leather splashed in. A Kennedy model is coming in a soft blue pastel, too. A boat shoe and slip-on model are also on the way, as seen here in a teal and yellow color-up, respectively.

Click here for all the pics.

Clae for Spring 2010 - Russell

Clae for Spring 2010 - Parker

Clae for Spring 2010 - Kennedy

Clae for Spring 2010 - Khan

Clae for Spring 2010

Clae

Matt
clae got some real hot shoes.. i’m planning on getting a pair.
out of this line-up i think the khans and the russels are the best
C. Lucratif
This collection is fresh. Good to see new brands paving a way. I will definitely be on the lookout for these.. Website info???
-C. Lucratif
Lucratif Street
LucratifStreet.com
bielasiak
clae.com
pretty simple bud.
suckers…
I hate clae. just because your a streetwear brand does not mean you stick to simple casual designs. throw an air bubble or something with it. use some mesh. be different; distinguish yourself, and people wonder why everybody chooses nike.
mc
the russels are nice, suckers you ever see the wool the patent’s these are far from simple you are just a moron
sneakfiend1
Get ur head out ur ass for just a minute Suckers! I just got my russell wool joints and they are so fresh and very much different from what NIke or anyone out there in the sneaker game is doin. The materials and sole alone are very durable and appear less likely to crease for at least a good year before they are even broke in. Try that with some 1′s or dunks.
Koebot
Can you say “hater”? Nothing wrong with Claes designs. They are already different and stand out. I’m a big Nike/Dunk head but I turn to Clae for a more casual “grown up” look. I’ve been a fan since I first spotted the Russels over a year ago. Not every shoe has to have mesh and air bubbles. Maybe when I was fourteen. But anyway, those white on white Parkers are fresh! A must cop for me.
danield6
lol @ suckers… hahaha! i suppose you have the same opinion for formal shoes, huh?
you clearly don’t have any diversity in style so, you hating on a brand like clae is pointless.
can’t blame you though if all you wear are jerseys, shorts, and loose shirts.
——————-
as for the shoes, the russels and khans are nice.
Mickey Mantle
yo Clae is the most slept on Jawnt at the moment……Nike blows so bad right now, they fell so hard..I’ve been buying Van’s mo TOO….Clae an Gourmets ALL DAY.
suckers…
okay maybe i should not have gone so far and said they are not different, they obviously have their own look. I mean no other company makes shoes this ugly. freakin lames wear high-top boat shoes w/straps. seriously them khans are gross as far as the russells…lets just say they remind me of my carpet(plain&boring). sad thing is the rest of this ish looks worse than those two.
marq
both the hi’s r sereious bu u lied 2 me matt i didnt sneak in the club i got turned around wit these n the everybodys but oh well i still refuuse 2 wear hardbottoms
aye!!!!
parker whites r crack!!!!!
cheese
hahaha (suckers) uve got to b a moron.. how old r u??? 12??? i rock all my sb’s still.. ive been in tha game for more years than ive got fingers… these shoes are for grown people… if you dont have style these arnt for u.. so i suggest u go ahead go thru puberty and mayb when ur in ur mid to late 20′s pik up a pair of clae’s…. mean while ill keep buyin these and ull keep rockin watever “urban wear” clothing u can find… ur probly not even old enuff to get into clubs or any type of place where u need to dress up… u cant wear neon airmax 95′s w/ bubbles everywhere all ur life….ha
greenmaker24
some of these are ok

'; ?>